This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS

Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT). BJS 2014; 101: 1774-1783.

Published: 12th November 2014

Authors: K. L. Protopapa, J. C. Simpson, N. C. E. Smith, S. R. Moonesinghe

Background

Existing risk stratification tools have limitations and clinical experience suggests they are not used routinely. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a preoperative risk stratification tool to predict 30‐day mortality after non‐cardiac surgery in adults by analysis of data from the observational National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) Knowing the Risk study.

Method

The data set was split into derivation and validation cohorts. Logistic regression was used to construct a model in the derivation cohort to create the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT), which was tested in the validation cohort.

Results

Prospective data for 19 097 cases in 326 hospitals were obtained from the NCEPOD study. Following exclusion of 2309, details of 16 788 patients were analysed (derivation cohort 11 219, validation cohort 5569). A model of 45 risk factors was refined on repeated regression analyses to develop a model comprising six variables: American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA‐PS) grade, urgency of surgery (expedited, urgent, immediate), high‐risk surgical specialty (gastrointestinal, thoracic, vascular), surgical severity (from minor to complex major), cancer and age 65 years or over. In the validation cohort, the SORT was well calibrated and demonstrated better discrimination than the ASA‐PS and Surgical Risk Scale; areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 0·91 (95 per cent c.i. 0·88 to 0·94), 0·87 (0·84 to 0·91) and 0·88 (0·84 to 0·92) respectively (P < 0·001).

Conclusion

The SORT allows rapid and simple data entry of six preoperative variables, and provides a percentage mortality risk for individuals undergoing surgery.

Full text

You may also be interested in

Leading article

Network meta‐analysis of urinary retention and mortality after Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia under local, regional or general anaesthesia.

Authors: J. H. H. Olsen, S. Öberg, K. Andresen, T. W. Klausen, J. Rosenberg

Original article

Outcomes of surgery for benign and malignant adrenal disease from the British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons’ national registry. BJS 2019; 106: 1495-1503.

Authors: N. Patel, R. J. Egan, B. R. Carter, D. M. Scott‐Coombes, M. J. Stechman, A. Afzaal et al.

Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT). BJS 2014; 101: 1774-1783.

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

You may also be interested in

A good surgical death. BJS 2019; 106: 1427-1428.

Randomized controlled trial of plain English and visual abstracts for disseminating surgical research via social media.

Effect of donor nephrectomy time during circulatory‐dead donor kidney retrieval on transplant graft failure.

Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training.

Network meta‐analysis of urinary retention and mortality after Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia under local, regional or general anaesthesia.

Diagnostic performance of MRI and histology in assessment of deep lipomatous tumours.

Dysregulation of the actin scavenging system and inhibition of DNase activity following severe thermal injury.

Trauma models to identify major trauma and mortality in the prehospital setting.

5G‐assisted telementored surgery.

Validation of the Norwegian survival prediction model in trauma (NORMIT) in Swedish trauma populations.

Human model of burn injury that quantifies the benefit of cooling as a first aid measure. BJS 2019; 106: 1472-1479.

Outcomes of surgery for benign and malignant adrenal disease from the British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons’ national registry. BJS 2019; 106: 1495-1503.