This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS

Nipple‐sparing mastectomy in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and variants of uncertain significance. BJS 2015; 102: 1354-1359.

Published: 27th August 2015

Authors: A. T. Manning, C. Wood, A. Eaton, M. Stempel, D. Capko, A. Pusic et al.

Background

Nipple‐sparing mastectomy (NSM) is associated with improved cosmesis and is being performed increasingly. Its role in BRCA mutation carriers has not been well described. This was a study of the indications for, and outcomes of, NSM in BRCA mutation carriers.

Method

BRCA mutation carriers who underwent NSM were identified. Details of patient demographics, surgical procedures, complications, and relevant disease stage and follow‐up were recorded.

Results

A total of 177 NSMs were performed in 89 BRCA mutation carriers between September 2005 and December 2013. Twenty‐six patients of median age 41 years had NSM for early‐stage breast cancer and a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Mean tumour size was 1·4 (range 0·1–3·5) cm. Sixty‐three patients of median age 39 years had prophylactic NSM, eight of whom had an incidental diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. There were no local or regional recurrences in the 26 patients with breast cancer at a median follow‐up of 28 (i.q.r. 15–43) months. There were no newly diagnosed breast cancers in the 63 patients undergoing prophylactic NSM at a median follow‐up of 26 (11–42) months. All patients had immediate breast reconstruction. Five patients (6 per cent) required subsequent excision of the nipple–areola complex for oncological or other reasons. Skin desquamation occurred in 68 (38·4 per cent) of the 177 breasts, and most resolved without intervention. Debridement was required in 13 (7·3 per cent) of the 177 breasts, and tissue‐expander or implant removal was necessary in six instances (3·4 per cent).

Conclusion

NSM is an acceptable choice for patients with BRCA mutations, with no evidence of compromise to oncological safety at short‐term follow‐up. Complication rates were acceptable, and subsequent excision of the nipple–areola complex was rarely required.

Full text

You may also be interested in

Original article

Nationwide population‐based study of the impact of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy on the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors: E. Heeg, J. X. Harmeling, B. E. Becherer, P. J. Marang‐van de Mheen, M. T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters, M. A. M. Mureau et al.

Original article

Population‐based study of the effect of preoperative breast MRI on the surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ. BJS 2019; 106: 1488-1494.

Authors: K. B. I. M. Keymeulen, S. M. E. Geurts, M. B. I. Lobbes, E. M. Heuts, L. E. M. Duijm, L. F. S. Kooreman et al.

Original article

International multidisciplinary expert panel consensus on breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. BJS 2019; 106: 1327-1340.

Authors: M. B. Nava, J. R. Benson, W. Audretsch, P. Blondeel, G. Catanuto, M. W. Clemens et al.

Original article

Prognostic impact of repeat sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence. BJS 2019; 106: 574-585.

Authors: I. G. M. Poodt, G. Vugts, R. J. Schipper, R. M. H. Roumen, H. J. T. Rutten, A. J. G. Maaskant‐Braat et al.

Notes: No impact

Original article

Effect of preoperative injection of superparamagnetic iron oxide particles on rates of sentinel lymph node dissection in women undergoing surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (SentiNot study). BJS 2019; 106: 720-728.

Authors: A. Karakatsanis, A.‐F. Hersi, L. Pistiolis, R. Olofsson Bagge, P. M. Lykoudis, S. Eriksson et al.

Original article

Short‐term cost‐effectiveness of one‐stage implant‐based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two‐stage expander‐implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. BJS 2019; 106: 586-595.

Authors: V. L. Negenborn, J. M. Smit, R. E. G. Dikmans, H. A. H. Winters, J. W. R. Twisk, P. Q. Ruhé et al.

Original article

Autologous fat transplantation alters gene expression patterns related to inflammation and hypoxia in the irradiated human breast. BJS 2019; 106: 563-573.

Authors: A. Lindegren, I. Schultz, I. Sinha, L. Cheung, A. A. Khan, M. Tekle et al.

Notes: Effects on fibrosis after radiotherapy

Original article

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ. BJS 2019; 106: 375-383.

Authors: F. Magnoni, G. Massari, G. Santomauro, V. Bagnardi, E. Pagan, G. Peruzzotti et al.

Original article

Patient‐level costs in margin re‐excision for breast‐conserving surgery. BJS 2019; 106: 384-394.

Authors: Y. Grant, R. Al‐Khudairi, E. St John, M. Barschkett, D. Cunningham, R. Al‐Mufti et al.

Notes: Reoperations expensive

Systematic review

Meta‐analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with initial biopsy‐proven node‐positive breast cancer. BJS 2018; 105: 1541-1552.

Authors: S. R. Tee, L. A. Devane, D. Evoy, J. Rothwell, J. Geraghty, R. S. Prichard et al.

Notes: In selected patients using dual tracer

Original article

Feasibility study of combined dynamic imaging and lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery for breast cancer‐related lymphoedema. BJS 2019; 106: 100-110.

Authors: A. A. Khan, I. Hernan, J. A. Adamthwaite, K. W. D. Ramsey

Notes: Effective in selected patients

Randomized clinical trial

INTEND II randomized clinical trial of intraoperative duct endoscopy in pathological nipple discharge. BJS 2018; 105: 1583-1590.

Authors: G. Gui, A. Agusti, D. Twelves, S. Tang, M. Kabir, C. Montgomery et al.

Notes: Identifies causative lesion