This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS

Outcomes of laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomy. BJS 2014; 101: 1160-1165.

Published: 10th June 2014

Authors: I. White, J. T. Jenkins, R. Coomber, S. K. Clark, R. K. S. Phillips, R. H. Kennedy et al.

Background

The literature on laparoscopic restorative proctectomy (RP) and proctocolectomy (RPC) is limited. This study compared clinical outcomes of laparoscopic RP and RPC with those of conventional open surgery at one centre.

Method

Data were analysed from consecutive patients undergoing RPC and RP between November 2006 and November 2011. A standard laparoscopic technique was developed during the first 2 years, performed by two laparoscopic surgeons, with selection of patients who had not previously undergone open colectomy. Study endpoints included postoperative length of stay, 30‐day morbidity, readmission, reoperation, pouch function and failure.

Results

A total of 207 patients were included; open surgery was performed in 131 (63·3 per cent) and a laparoscopic procedure in 76 (36·7 per cent). There were no significant differences in patient demographics. The conversion rate was 9 per cent (7 of 76). The median (i.q.r.) duration of operation was shorter for open than for laparoscopic procedures: 208 (178–255) versus 285 (255–325) min respectively (P < 0·001). Laparoscopic RPC had a shorter length of stay: median (i.q.r.) 6 (4–8) versus 8 (7–12) days (P < 0·001). The rate of minor complications was lower in the laparoscopic group (33 versus 50·4 per cent; odds ratio (OR) 0·48, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·27 to 0·87).There were no significant differences in total complications (51 per cent after laparoscopy versus 61·5 per cent after open surgery; OR 0·66, 0·37 to 1·17), anastomotic leakage, major morbidity, 30‐day readmission, reoperation and stoma closure rates. Pouch failure (including permanent stoma) occurred in 14 (7·7 per cent) of 181 patients. Three patients died, all in the open surgery group.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic RPC is feasible with some short‐term advantages.

Full text

You may also be interested in

Original article

Early MRI predictors of disease‐free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer from the GRECCAR 4 trial. BJS 2019; 106: 1530-1541.

Authors: S. Nougaret, F. Castan, H. Forges, H. A. Vargas, B. Gallix, S. Gourgou et al.

Original article

Secondary technical resectability of colorectal cancer liver metastases after chemotherapy with or without selective internal radiotherapy in the randomized SIRFLOX trial.

Authors: B. Garlipp, P. Gibbs, G. A. Van Hazel, R. Jeyarajah, R. C. G. Martin, C. J. Bruns et al.

Original article

Population‐based study of the impact of small bowel obstruction due to adhesions on short‐ and medium‐term mortality.

Authors: R. Behman, A. B. Nathens, B. Haas, N. Look Hong, P. Pechlivanoglou, P. Karanicolas et al.

Original article

Prospective cohort study of appendicectomy for treatment of therapy‐refractory ulcerative colitis.

Authors: M. E. Stellingwerf, S. Sahami, D. C. Winter, S. T. Martin, G. R. D'Haens, G. Cullen et al.

Original article

Long‐term follow‐up of the AVOD randomized trial of antibiotic avoidance in uncomplicated diverticulitis. BJS 2019; 106: 1542-1548.

Authors: D. Isacson, K. Smedh, M. Nikberg, A. Chabok

Original article

Pushing the boundaries of pelvic exenteration by maintaining survival at the cost of morbidity. BJS 2019; 106: 1393-1403.

Authors: R. L. Venchiarutti, M. J. Solomon, C. E. Koh, J. M. Young, D. Steffens

Systematic review

Meta‐analysis of the role of colonoscopy after an episode of left‐sided acute diverticulitis. BJS 2019; 106: 988-997.

Authors: S. J. Rottier, S. T. Dijk, A. A. W. Geloven, W. H. Schreurs, W. A. Draaisma, W. A. Enst et al.

Randomized clinical trial

Multicentre randomized clinical trial of colonic J pouch or straight stapled colorectal reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors: S. Pucciarelli, P. Del Bianco, U. Pace, F. Bianco, A. Restivo, I. Maretto et al.

Review

Mechanisms of immunogenicity in colorectal cancer. BJS 2019; 106: 1283-1297.

Authors: T. O. Sillo, A. D. Beggs, D. G. Morton, G. Middleton

Systematic review

Meta‐analysis of the effect of extending the interval after long‐course chemoradiotherapy before surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer. BJS 2019; 106: 1298-1310.

Authors: É. J. Ryan, D. P. O'Sullivan, M. E. Kelly, A. Z. Syed, P. C. Neary, P. R. O'Connell et al.

Randomized clinical trial

Randomized clinical trial of accelerated enhanced recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery (RecoverMI trial). BJS 2019; 106: 1311-1318.

Authors: B. K. Bednarski, T. P. Nickerson, Y. N. You, C. A. Messick, B. Speer, V. Gottumukkala et al.

Original article

Postoperative complications in relation to overall treatment time in patients with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors: J. Erlandsson, D. Pettersson, B. Glimelius, T. Holm, A. Martling