This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS
Patients’ preferences for treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer. BJS 2018; 105: 1630-1638.
Published: 27th June 2018
Authors: B. J. Noordman, E. W. de Bekker‐Grob, P. P. L. O. Coene, E. van der Harst, S. M. Lagarde, J. Shapiro et al.
Background
After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) plus surgery for oesophageal cancer, 29 per cent of patients have a pathologically complete response in the resection specimen. Active surveillance after nCRT (instead of standard oesophagectomy) may improve health‐related quality of life (HRQoL), but patients need to undergo frequent diagnostic tests and it is unknown whether survival is worse than that after standard oesophagectomy. Factors that influence patients' preferences, and trade‐offs that patients are willing to make in their choice between surgery and active surveillance were investigated here.
Method
A prospective discrete‐choice experiment was conducted. Patients with oesophageal cancer completed questionnaires 4–6 weeks after nCRT, before surgery. Patients' preferences were quantified using scenarios based on five aspects: 5‐year overall survival, short‐term HRQoL, long‐term HRQoL, the risk that oesophagectomy is still necessary, and the frequency of clinical examinations using endoscopy and PET–CT. Panel latent class analysis was used.
Results
Some 100 of 104 patients (96·2 per cent) responded. All aspects, except the frequency of clinical examinations, influenced patients' preferences. Five‐year overall survival, the chance that oesophagectomy is still necessary and long‐term HRQoL were the most important attributes. On average, based on calculation of the indifference point between standard surgery and active surveillance, patients were willing to trade off 16 per cent 5‐year overall survival to reduce the risk that oesophagectomy is necessary from 100 per cent (standard surgery) to 35 per cent (active surveillance).
Conclusion
Patients are willing to trade off substantial 5‐year survival to achieve a reduction in the risk that oesophagectomy is necessary.
Full textYou may also be interested in
Randomized clinical trial
Authors: K. Misawa, Y. Mochizuki, M. Sakai, H. Teramoto, D. Morimoto, H. Nakayama et al.
Randomized clinical trial
Authors: R. J. Hopkins, T. Irvine, G. G. Jamieson, P. G. Devitt, D. I. Watson
Randomized clinical trial
Authors: B. Sunde, F. Klevebro, A. Johar, G. Johnsen, A.‐B. Jacobsen, N. I. Glenjen et al.
Original article
Authors: Y. Baba, T. Yagi, K. Kosumi, K. Okadome, D. Nomoto, K. Eto et al.
Original article
Authors: Å. A. Fretland, V. J. Dagenborg, G. M. Waaler Bjørnelv, D. L. Aghayan, A. M. Kazaryan, L. Barkhatov et al.
Original article
Authors: J. A. Elliott, L. O'Byrne, G. Foley, C. F. Murphy, S. L. Doyle, S. King et al.
Original article
Authors: W. H. Allum, E. C. Smyth, J. M. Blazeby, H. I. Grabsch, S. M. Griffin, S. Rowley et al.
Systematic review
Authors: N. Moody, A. Adiamah, F. Yanni, D. Gomez
Article
Authors: Y. Y. Broza, S. Khatib, A. Gharra, A. Krilaviciute, H. Amal, I. Polaka et al.
Original article
Authors: S. Ahlin, C. Cefalù, I. Bondia‐Pons, E. Capristo, L. Marini, A. Gastaldelli et al.
Original article
Authors: A.‐H. Chen, W.‐H. Chan, Y.‐H. Lee, J.‐H. Tseng, T.‐S. Yeh, C.‐T. Chiu et al.
Original article
Authors: J. X. Lin, C. Yoon, J. Desiderio, B. C. Yi, P. Li, C. H. Zheng et al.