This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS

Propensity score‐matched analysis of robotic versus open surgical enucleation for small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. BJS 2016; 103: 1358-1364.

Published: 2nd August 2016

Authors: F. Tian, X.‐F. Hong, W.‐M. Wu, X.‐L. Han, M.‐Y. Wang, L. Cong et al.

Background

Enucleation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) via robotic surgery has rarely been described. This study sought to assess the safety and efficiency of robotic surgery for the enucleation of small pNETs.

Method

A comparison was conducted of enucleation of pNETs smaller than 2 cm by robotic or open surgery between January 2000 and May 2015. Propensity score matching was used to balance sex, age, BMI, tumour location and tumour diameter. Pathological results, safety‐related outcomes (postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate, estimated blood loss, and short‐term mortality and morbidity) and efficiency‐related outcomes (duration of surgery and postoperative length of hospital stay) were compared between the groups.

Results

A cohort of 120 patients with pNET were enrolled in the study (1 : 1 matched for open or robotic surgery, 60 per group). Ninety‐three patients (77·5 per cent) had a grade 1 tumour and 114 (95·0 per cent) had an insulinoma. Robotic surgery had a conversion rate of 5 per cent (3 of 60), and was not associated with an increased POPF rate (10 per cent versus 17 per cent after open surgery; P = 0·283) or grade III–V surgical complications according to the Dindo–Clavien classification (3 versus 10 per cent respectively; P = 0·272). Estimated blood loss was reduced with the robotic approach (32·5 versus 80·0 ml in the open group; P = 0·008), as was duration of surgery (117 versus 150 min; P < 0·001). Length of hospital stay after surgery was similar in the two groups (12·0 versus 13·5 days respectively; P = 0·071).

Conclusion

Robotic surgery for enucleation of pNETs smaller than 2 cm did not increase POPF or major complication rates, and reduced the duration of surgery and estimated blood loss, compared with open surgery. Registration number: NCT02125929 (
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/).

Full text

You may also be interested in

Leading article

Network meta‐analysis of urinary retention and mortality after Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia under local, regional or general anaesthesia.

Authors: J. H. H. Olsen, S. Öberg, K. Andresen, T. W. Klausen, J. Rosenberg

Original article

Propensity score‐matched analysis of robotic versus open surgical enucleation for small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. BJS 2016; 103: 1358-1364.

Background

Method

Results

Conclusion

You may also be interested in

A good surgical death. BJS 2019; 106: 1427-1428.

Randomized controlled trial of plain English and visual abstracts for disseminating surgical research via social media.

Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training.

Network meta‐analysis of urinary retention and mortality after Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia under local, regional or general anaesthesia.

Effect of donor nephrectomy time during circulatory‐dead donor kidney retrieval on transplant graft failure.

Systematic review of functional outcome and quality of life after total pancreatectomy.

Diagnostic performance of MRI and histology in assessment of deep lipomatous tumours.

Dysregulation of the actin scavenging system and inhibition of DNase activity following severe thermal injury.

Trauma models to identify major trauma and mortality in the prehospital setting.

5G‐assisted telementored surgery.

Validation of the Norwegian survival prediction model in trauma (NORMIT) in Swedish trauma populations.

Multicentre observational cohort study of implementation and outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.