This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS

Systematic review and meta‐analysis of trainee‐ versus expert surgeon‐performed colorectal resection. BJS 2014; 101: 750-759.

Published: 23rd April 2014

Authors: M. Kelly, A. Bhangu, P. Singh, J. E. F. Fitzgerald, P. P. Tekkis

Background

The aim of this meta‐analysis was to compare short‐term and oncological outcomes following colorectal resection performed by surgical trainees and expert surgeons.

Method

Systematic literature searches were made to identify articles on colorectal resection for benign or malignant disease published until April 2013. The primary outcome was the rate of anastomotic leak. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative variables, postoperative adverse event rates, and early and late oncological outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs), weighted mean differences (WMDs) and hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes were calculated using meta‐analytical techniques.

Results

The final analysis included 19 non‐randomized, observational studies of 14 344 colorectal resections, of which 8845 (61·7 per cent) were performed by experts and 5499 (38·3 per cent) by trainees. The overall rate of anastomotic leak was 2·6 per cent. Compared with experts, trainees had a lower leak rate (3·0 versus 2·0 per cent; OR 0·72, P = 0·010), but there was no difference between experts and expert‐supervised trainees (3·2 versus 2·5 per cent; OR 0·77, P = 0·080). A subgroup of expert‐supervised trainees had a significantly longer operating time for laparoscopic procedures (WMD 10·00 min, P < 0·001), lower 30‐day mortality (OR 0·70, P = 0·001) and lower wound infection rate (OR 0·67, P = 0·040) than experts. No difference was observed in laparoscopic conversion, R0 resection or local recurrence rates. For oncological resection, there was no significant difference in cancer‐specific survival between trainees and consultants (3 studies, 533 patients; hazard ratio 0·76, P = 0·130).

Conclusion

In selected patients, it is appropriate for supervised trainees to perform colorectal resection.

Full text

You may also be interested in

Original article

Early MRI predictors of disease‐free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer from the GRECCAR 4 trial. BJS 2019; 106: 1530-1541.

Authors: S. Nougaret, F. Castan, H. Forges, H. A. Vargas, B. Gallix, S. Gourgou et al.

Original article

Secondary technical resectability of colorectal cancer liver metastases after chemotherapy with or without selective internal radiotherapy in the randomized SIRFLOX trial.

Authors: B. Garlipp, P. Gibbs, G. A. Van Hazel, R. Jeyarajah, R. C. G. Martin, C. J. Bruns et al.

Original article

Population‐based study of the impact of small bowel obstruction due to adhesions on short‐ and medium‐term mortality.

Authors: R. Behman, A. B. Nathens, B. Haas, N. Look Hong, P. Pechlivanoglou, P. Karanicolas et al.

Original article

Prospective cohort study of appendicectomy for treatment of therapy‐refractory ulcerative colitis.

Authors: M. E. Stellingwerf, S. Sahami, D. C. Winter, S. T. Martin, G. R. D'Haens, G. Cullen et al.

Original article

Long‐term follow‐up of the AVOD randomized trial of antibiotic avoidance in uncomplicated diverticulitis. BJS 2019; 106: 1542-1548.

Authors: D. Isacson, K. Smedh, M. Nikberg, A. Chabok

Original article

Pushing the boundaries of pelvic exenteration by maintaining survival at the cost of morbidity. BJS 2019; 106: 1393-1403.

Authors: R. L. Venchiarutti, M. J. Solomon, C. E. Koh, J. M. Young, D. Steffens

Systematic review

Meta‐analysis of the role of colonoscopy after an episode of left‐sided acute diverticulitis. BJS 2019; 106: 988-997.

Authors: S. J. Rottier, S. T. Dijk, A. A. W. Geloven, W. H. Schreurs, W. A. Draaisma, W. A. Enst et al.

Randomized clinical trial

Multicentre randomized clinical trial of colonic J pouch or straight stapled colorectal reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors: S. Pucciarelli, P. Del Bianco, U. Pace, F. Bianco, A. Restivo, I. Maretto et al.

Review

Mechanisms of immunogenicity in colorectal cancer. BJS 2019; 106: 1283-1297.

Authors: T. O. Sillo, A. D. Beggs, D. G. Morton, G. Middleton

Systematic review

Meta‐analysis of the effect of extending the interval after long‐course chemoradiotherapy before surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer. BJS 2019; 106: 1298-1310.

Authors: É. J. Ryan, D. P. O'Sullivan, M. E. Kelly, A. Z. Syed, P. C. Neary, P. R. O'Connell et al.

Randomized clinical trial

Randomized clinical trial of accelerated enhanced recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery (RecoverMI trial). BJS 2019; 106: 1311-1318.

Authors: B. K. Bednarski, T. P. Nickerson, Y. N. You, C. A. Messick, B. Speer, V. Gottumukkala et al.

Original article

Postoperative complications in relation to overall treatment time in patients with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors: J. Erlandsson, D. Pettersson, B. Glimelius, T. Holm, A. Martling