This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS

Comparison of self-gripping mesh and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of long-term results. Surgery 2018; 163: 351-360.

Published: 9th August 2018

Authors: Molegraaf M, Kaufmann R, Lange J

Conclusion

Insertion of self-gripping mesh was quicker (around 8 min) in this analysis that included 10 randomized trials and 2541 patients. There was no difference in the rate of chronic pain after 24 months: odds ratio 0.93, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.74 to 1.18.

You may also be interested in

Scientific Surgery

Open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair, TREPP versus TIPP in a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2021; 274: 698-704.

Authors: Bökkerink W, Koning G, Vriens PW, Mollen R, Harker M, Noordhof RK et al.

Scientific Surgery

Impact of mesh and fixation on chronic inguinal pain in Lichtenstein hernia repair: 5-year outcomes from the Finn Mesh Study. World J Surgery 2021; 45: 459–464.

Authors: Matikainan M, Vironen J, Kossi J, Hulmi T, Hertsi M, Rantanen T et al.

Scientific Surgery

Heavyweight mesh is superior to lightweight mesh in laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2021; 273: 890-899.

Authors: Bakker W, Aufenacker TJ, Boschman JS, Burgmans JP

Scientific Surgery

Robotic inguinal vs transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The RIVAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2020; 155: 380-387.

Authors: Prabhu A, Carbonell A, Hope W, Warren J, Higgins R, Jacob B et al.

Scientific Surgery

Lightweight mesh is recommended in open (Lichtenstein) hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 2020; 167: 581-589.

Authors: Bakker WJ, Aufenacker TJ, Boschman JS, Burgmans JPJ

Scientific Surgery

Electrospun P(LLA-CL) nanoscale fibrinogen patch vs porcine small intestine submucosa graft repair of inguinal hernia in adults: a randomized, single-blind, controlled, multicenter, noninferiority trial. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 229: 541–551

Authors: Li S, Xiao S, Yang L, Hua L, Qiu Z, Hu X et al.

Scientific Surgery

Local vs. other forms of anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Surg 2019; 218: 1008-1015

Authors: Argo M, Favela J, Huerta S

Scientific Surgery

Open inguinal hernia repair: a network meta-analysis comparing self-gripping mesh, suture fixation, and glue fixation. World J Surg 2019; 43: 447–456.

Authors: Rausa E, Asti E, Kelly ME, Aiolfi A, Lovece A, Bonitta G et al.

Scientific Surgery

Cost-effectiveness of randomized study of laparoscopic versus open bilateral inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 2018; 268: 725-730.

Authors: Ielpo B, Nuñez-Alfonsel J, Hipolito D, Diaz E, Fabra I, Caruso R et al.

Scientific Surgery

A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein repair for bilateral inguinal hernias. Surgery 2018; 216: 78-83.

Authors: lelpo B, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, Caruso R, Malavé L et al.

Scientific Surgery

Chronic pain after mesh versus nonmesh repair of inguinal hernias: A systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgery 2018; 163: 1151–1159.

Authors: Öberg S, Andreson K, Klausen TW, Rosenberg J

Scientific Surgery

Higher recurrence rate after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with ultrapro lightweight mesh: 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial (TULP-trial). Ann Surg 2018; 268: 241-246.

Authors: Roos M, Bakker WJ, Schouten N, Voorbrood C, Clevers GJ, Verleisdonk EJ et al.