Efficacy and safety of the duodeno-jejunal bypass liner in patients with metabolic syndrome. A multicenter randomized controlled trial (ENDOMETAB). Ann Surg 2020; 272: 696-702.

Published: 9th February 2021

Authors: Caiazzo R, Branche J, Raverdy V, Czernichow S, Carette C, Robert M et al.

Conclusion

This study compared standard care with endoscopic insertion of the liner in 82 patients. After one year, remission of the metabolic syndrome occurred in 12 per cent compared to 10 per cent in controls (P=0.72). Patients who had the liner lost more weight in the first 12 months, but weight in both groups was similar 12 months after the liner was removed.

Pubmed Link

You may also be interested in

Scientific Surgery

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss, comorbidities, and biochemical outcomes from randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2021; 273: 66-74.

Authors: Lee Y, Doumouras A, Yu J, Aditya I, Gmora S, Anvari M et al.

Scientific Surgery

Banded versus nonbanded sleeve gastrectomy. A randomized controlled trial with 3 years of follow-up. Ann Surg 2020; 272: 690-695.

Authors: Fink J, Hetzenecker A, Seifert G, Runkel M, Laessle C, Fichtner-Feigl S et al.

Scientific Surgery

Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in pain management after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG): A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 2019; 217: 126-132.

Authors: Saber AA, Lee YC, Arjun C, Namik O, Armand A, Al-Ayoubi S et al.

Scientific Surgery

Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2019; 393: 1299-1309.

Authors: Maud R, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, Caiazzo R, Sterkers A, Khamphommala L et al.

Scientific Surgery

Effectiveness of fibrin sealant application on the development of staple line complications after sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2018; 268: 762-768.

Authors: Rebibo L, Dhahri A, Chati R, Cosse C, Huet E, Regimbeau J-M et al.

Scientific Surgery

Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity. The SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018; 319: 255-265.

Authors: Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Vetter D, Kröll D , Borbély Y et al.

Scientific Surgery

Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity. The SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018; 319: 241-254.

Authors: Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J, Juuti A, Leivonen M, Peromaa-Haavisto P et al.

Scientific Surgery

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-Y-gastric bypass for morbid obesity: 3-year outcomes of the prospective randomized Swiss Multicenter Bypass Or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS). Ann Surg 2017; 265: 466-473.

Authors: Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Vetter D, Nett P, Gass M, Borbély Y et al.

Scientific Surgery

Standard vs distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with body mass index 50 to 60. A double-blind, randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2016; 151: 1146-1155.

Authors: Risstad H, Svanevik M, Kristinsson JA, Hjelmesæth J, Aasheim T, Hofsø D et al.

Scientific Surgery

Impact of surgical technique on long-term complication rate after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial (ANOSEAN Study). Ann Surg 2016; 264: 738-744.

Authors: Le Coq B, Frering V, Ghunaim M, Campan P, Dabrowski A, Mulliez E et al.

Scientific Surgery

Closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 1397–1404.

Authors: Stenberg E, Szabo E, Ågren G, Ottosson J, Marsk R, Lönroth H et al.

Scientific Surgery

Three-year outcomes of bariatric surgery vs lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2015; 150: 931-940.

Authors: Courcoulas AP, Belle SH, Neiberg RH, Pierson SK, Eagleton JK, Kalarchian MA et al. et al.