Five year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernia with sutures versus absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh. Ann Surg 2020; 272: 241-247.

Published: 15th October 2020

Authors: Watson DI, Thompson SK, Devitt PG, Aly A, Irvine T, Woods SD et al.

Conclusion

After five years in this study that included 126 procedures, any size recurrence was noted in 39 per cent after suture repair, 57 per cent after absorbable mesh repair and 43 per cent after non-absorbable mesh (P=0,371).

Pubmed Link

You may also be interested in

Scientific Surgery

Prevention of fascial dehiscence with onlay prophylactic mesh in emergency laparotomy: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 230: 76-87.

Authors: Lima HVG, Rassian R, Novo FCF, Bernini CO, Montero EFS, Utiyama EM et al.

Scientific Surgery

Primary fascial closure during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair improves patient quality of life. A multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2020; 271: 434-439

Authors: Bernardi K, Olavarria OA, Holihan JL, Kao LS, Ko TC, Roth JS et al.

Scientific Surgery

Prophylactic biological mesh Reinforcement versus Standard Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS): a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 395: 417-426

Authors: Reinforcement of Stoma Closure Site (ROCSS) Collaborative , West Midlands Research Collaborative

Scientific Surgery

Prophylactic intraperitoneal onlay mesh following midline laparotomy—long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2019; 43: 1669-1675.

Authors: Glauser PM, Brosi P, Speich B, Kaser SA, Heigl A, Rosenberg R et al.

Scientific Surgery

Effectiveness of prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh implantation for prevention of incisional hernia in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2019; 154: 109-115.

Authors: Kohler A, Lavanchy JL, Lenoir U, Kurmann A, Candinas D, Beldi G et al.

Scientific Surgery

Prophylactic intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement reduces the risk of incisional hernia, two-year results of a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 2018; 42: 1687–1694.

Authors: Brosi P, Glauser PM, Speich B, Käser SA, Maurer CA

Scientific Surgery

Mesh versus patch repair for epigastric and umbilical hernia (MORPHEUS Trial); one-year results of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2018; 42: 1312-1320.

Authors: Ponten JEH, Leclercq WKG, Lettinga T, Heemskerk J, Konsten JLM, Castelijns PSS et al.

Scientific Surgery

Modifying risks in ventral hernia patients with prehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2018; 268: 674-680.

Authors: Liang MK, Bernardi K, Holihan JL, Cherla DV, Escamilla R, Lew DF et al.

Scientific Surgery

Prophylactic mesh reinforcement versus sutured closure to prevent incisional hernias after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair via midline laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018; 56: 120-128.

Authors: Indrakusuma R, Jalalzadeh H, ven der Meij JE, Balm R, Koelemay MJW

Scientific Surgery

Incisional hernia after midline versus transverse specimen extraction incision: a randomized trial in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 2018; 268: 41-47.

Authors: Lee L, Mata J, Droeser R, Kaneva P, Liberman S, Charlebois P et al.

Scientific Surgery

Mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia in adults: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 2018; 391: 860-869.

Authors: Kaufmann R, Halm JA, Eker HH, Klitsie PJ, Niewenhuizen J, van Geldere D et al.

Scientific Surgery

Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017; 390: 567-576.

Authors: Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, Pierik RE, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW et al.