This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS

A randomised trial of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for early Barrett’s neoplasia. Gut 2017; 66: 783-793.

Published: 5th January 2018

Authors: Terheggen G, Horn EM, Vieth M, Gabbert H, Enderle M, Neugebauer A et al.

Conclusion

Both techniques were effective, but complete resection was more common after endoscopic submucosal dissection: 10/17 versus 2/17, P=0.01. The technique was, however, more time-consuming and resulted in two serious adverse events.

Pubmed Link

You may also be interested in

Scientific Surgery

Cytosponge-trefoil factor 3 versus usual care to identify Barrett’s oesophagus in a primary care setting: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 396: 333-344.

Authors: Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, O’Donovan M, Maroni R, Muldrew B, Debiram-Beeecham I et al.

Scientific Surgery

Esomeprazole and aspirin in Barrett’s oesophagus (AspECT): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet 2018; 392: 400–8.

Authors: Jankowski JAZ, de Caestecker J, Love SB, Reilly G, Watson P, Sanders S et al.

Scientific Surgery

Radiofrequency ablation vs. endoscopic surveillance for patients with Barrett esophagus and low-grade dysplasia. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311: 1209-1217.

Authors: Phao KN, van Vilsteren FGI, Weusten BLAM, Bisschops R, Schoon EJ, Ragunath K et al. et al.

Scientific Surgery

Stepwise radical endoscopic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s oesophagus with high-grade dysplasia or early cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Gut 2011; 60: 765–773.

Authors: van Vilsteren FGI, Pouw RE, Seewald S, Herrero LA, Sondermeijer CMT, Visser M et al.

Scientific Surgery

Randomized trial of argon plasma coagulation versus endoscopic surveillance for Barrett esophagus after antireflux surgery: late results. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 1016-1020.

Authors: Bright T, Watson DI, Tam W, Game PA, Astill D, Ackroyd R et al.

Scientific Surgery

Secondary chemoprevention of Barrett’s esophagus with celecoxib: results of a randomised trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99: 545-557.

Authors: Heath EI, Canto MI, Piantadosi S, Montgomery E, Weinstein WM, Herman JG et al.

Scientific Surgery

A randomised controlled trial of ablation of Barrett¿s oesophagus with multipolar elecrocoagulation versus argon plasma coagulation in combination with acid suppression: long term results. Gut 2006; 55: 1233-1239.

Authors: Sharma P, Wani S, Weston AP, Bansal A, Hall M, Mathur S et al. et al.

Scientific Surgery

5-Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy versus argon plasma coagulation for ablation of Barrett’s oesophagus: a randomised trial. Gut 2004; 53: 785-790.

Authors: Hage M, Siersema PD, van Dekken H, Steyerberg EW, Haringsma J, van de Vrie et al. et al.

Scientific Surgery

Long-term results of a randomized prospective study comparing medical and surgical treatment of Barrett’s esophagus Ann Surg 2003; 237: 291-8

Authors: Parrilla P, Martinez de Haro LF, Ortiz A, Munitiz V, Molina J, Bermejo J et al. et al.

Scientific Surgery

Photodynamic therapy for dysplastic Barrett’s oesophagus: a prospective, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial. Gut 2000; 27: 612-17.

Authors: Ackroyd R, Brown NJ, Davis MF, Stephenson TJ, Marcus SL, Stoddard CJ et al. et al.

Scientific Surgery

Endoscopic regression of Barrett’s oesophagus during omeprazole treatment: a randomised double blind study. Gut 1999; 46: 489-94.

Authors: Peters FTM, Ganesh S, Kuipers EJ, Sluiter WJ, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Lamers CBHW et al. et al.