This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS

Robotic inguinal vs transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The RIVAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2020; 155: 380-387.

Published: 7th April 2021

Authors: Prabhu A, Carbonell A, Hope W, Warren J, Higgins R, Jacob B et al.

Conclusion

This study that included 102 patients found no differences in the clinical outcomes between the two methods. Robotic hernia repair took a little longer (75.5 versus 40.5 min, P<0.001) and was more expensive ($3258 versus $1421, P<0.001).

You may also be interested in

Scientific Surgery

Open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair, TREPP versus TIPP in a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2021; 274: 698-704.

Authors: Bökkerink W, Koning G, Vriens PW, Mollen R, Harker M, Noordhof RK et al.

Scientific Surgery

Impact of mesh and fixation on chronic inguinal pain in Lichtenstein hernia repair: 5-year outcomes from the Finn Mesh Study. World J Surgery 2021; 45: 459–464.

Authors: Matikainan M, Vironen J, Kossi J, Hulmi T, Hertsi M, Rantanen T et al.

Scientific Surgery

Heavyweight mesh is superior to lightweight mesh in laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2021; 273: 890-899.

Authors: Bakker W, Aufenacker TJ, Boschman JS, Burgmans JP

Scientific Surgery

Lightweight mesh is recommended in open (Lichtenstein) hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 2020; 167: 581-589.

Authors: Bakker WJ, Aufenacker TJ, Boschman JS, Burgmans JPJ

Scientific Surgery

Electrospun P(LLA-CL) nanoscale fibrinogen patch vs porcine small intestine submucosa graft repair of inguinal hernia in adults: a randomized, single-blind, controlled, multicenter, noninferiority trial. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 229: 541–551

Authors: Li S, Xiao S, Yang L, Hua L, Qiu Z, Hu X et al.

Scientific Surgery

Local vs. other forms of anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Surg 2019; 218: 1008-1015

Authors: Argo M, Favela J, Huerta S

Scientific Surgery

Open inguinal hernia repair: a network meta-analysis comparing self-gripping mesh, suture fixation, and glue fixation. World J Surg 2019; 43: 447–456.

Authors: Rausa E, Asti E, Kelly ME, Aiolfi A, Lovece A, Bonitta G et al.

Scientific Surgery

Cost-effectiveness of randomized study of laparoscopic versus open bilateral inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 2018; 268: 725-730.

Authors: Ielpo B, Nuñez-Alfonsel J, Hipolito D, Diaz E, Fabra I, Caruso R et al.

Scientific Surgery

A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein repair for bilateral inguinal hernias. Surgery 2018; 216: 78-83.

Authors: lelpo B, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, Caruso R, Malavé L et al.

Scientific Surgery

Chronic pain after mesh versus nonmesh repair of inguinal hernias: A systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgery 2018; 163: 1151–1159.

Authors: Öberg S, Andreson K, Klausen TW, Rosenberg J

Scientific Surgery

Higher recurrence rate after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair with ultrapro lightweight mesh: 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial (TULP-trial). Ann Surg 2018; 268: 241-246.

Authors: Roos M, Bakker WJ, Schouten N, Voorbrood C, Clevers GJ, Verleisdonk EJ et al.

Scientific Surgery

Groin pain characteristics and recurrence rates: three-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing self-gripping Progrip mesh and sutured polypropylene mesh for open inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 2018; 267: 1029-1033.

Authors: Zwaans WA, Verhagen T, Wouters L, Loos M, Roumen R, Scheltinga M et al.