Short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy to open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Ann Surg 20129; 270: 983-991
Published: 24th January 2020
Authors: Lee H-J, Hyung WJ, Yang H-K, Han S, Park Y-K, An JY et al.
Early morbidity was significantly reduced in this study that included 1050 procedures: 16.6 versus 24.1 per cent, P=0.003. Postoperative pain scores were also reduced, and hospital stay shorter: 8.1 vs 9.3 days, P=0.005. Ninety day mortality was similar in both groups.Pubmed Link
You may also be interested in
Randomized comparison of gastric tube reconstruction with and without duodenal diversion plus Roux-en-Y anastomosis after esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2020; 272: 48-54.
Authors: Yano M, Sugimura K, Miyata H, Motoori M, Tanaka K, Omori T et al.
Health-related quality of life following hybrid minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Analysis of a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III controlled trial. The MIRO Trial. Ann Surg 2020; 271: 1023-1029.
Authors: Mariette C, Markar S, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Meunier B, Pezet D, Collet D et al.
Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage 1A or 1B gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicenter, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5: 142-151
Authors: Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Morita S, Yamada T, Brando E et al.
Direct oral feeding following minimally invasive esophagectomy (NUTRIENT II trial). An international, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2020; 271: 41-47
Authors: Berkelmans GH, Fransen LFC, Dolmans-Zwartjes ACP, Kouwenhoven EA, van Det MJ, Nilsson M et al.
Combined surgery and extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage vs surgery alone for treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer. The SEIPLUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2019; 154: 610-616
Authors: Guo J, Xu A, Sun X, Zhao X, Xia Y, Rao H et al.
Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2019; 269: 621-630.
Authors: van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, Schippers C, Brosens L, Joore HC et al.
Authors: Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Meunier B, Pezet D, Collet D et al.
Early oral feeding following McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy: an open-label, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Ann Surg 2018; 267: 435-442.
Authors: Sun H-B, Li Y, Liu X-B, Zhang R-X, Wang Z-F, Lerut T et al.
Circular stapling versus triangulating stapling for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Surgery 2017; 162: 131-138.
Authors: Hayata K, Nakamori M, Nakamura M, Ojima T, Iwahashi M, Katsuda M et al.
Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: The TIME Trial. Ann Surg 2017; 266: 232-236.
Authors: Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, Daams F, Roig Garcia J, Bonavina L et al.
A randomized controlled trial comparing antioxidant-enriched enteral nutrition with immune-enhancing enteral nutrition after esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Today 2013; 43: 1240-1249.
Authors: Nagano T, Fujita H, Tanaka T, Matono S, Murata K, Ishibashi N et al. et al.
A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. World J Surg 2013; 37: 1043-1050.
Authors: Wang WP, Gao Q, Wang KN, Shi H, Chen LQ