This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS

Suture cruroplasty versus prosthetic hiatal herniorrhaphy for large hiatal hernia: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2016; 263: 258-266.

Published: 4th February 2016

Authors: Memon MA, Memon B, Yunus RM, Khan S

Conclusion

There were four randomized trials consisting of 406 patients. Prosthetic repair reduced the need for reoperation (odds ratio 3.73, 1.18 to 11.82, P=0.03), but duration of operation, complication rates and recurrence rates were similar.

You may also be interested in

Scientific Surgery

Meta-analysis and systematic review of the use of a prosthetic mesh for prevention of parastomal hernia. Ann Surg 2021; 274: 20-28.

Authors: Prudhomme M, Fabbro-Peray P, Rullier E, Occean BV, Bertrand MM

Scientific Surgery

Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. One-year results from a prospective, multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2021; 273: 1076-1080.

Authors: Dhanani N, Olavarria O, Holihan J, Shah S, Wilson T, Loor M et al.

Scientific Surgery

Prophylactic single-use negative pressure dressing in closed surgical wounds after incisional hernia repair. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2021; 273: 1081-1086.

Authors: Bueno-Lledó J, Franco-Bernal A, Garcia-Voz-Mediano MT, Torregrosa-Gallud A, Bonafé S

Scientific Surgery

Preventing recurrence in clean and contaminated hernias using biologic versus synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair. The PRICE randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2021; 273: 648-655.

Authors: Harris H, Primus F, Young C, Carter JT, Lin M, Mukhtar R et al.

Scientific Surgery

Patient-reported outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal mesh. The PROVE-IT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 156: 22-29.

Authors: Petro CC, Zolin S, Krpata D, Alkhatib H, Tu C, Rosen MJ et al.

Scientific Surgery

Synthetic versus biological mesh in laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair (LAPSIS). Results of a multinational, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial. Ann Surg 2021; 273: 57-65.

Authors: Miserez M, Lefering R, Famiglietti F, Mathes T, Seidel D, Sauerland S et al.

Scientific Surgery

Five year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernia with sutures versus absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh. Ann Surg 2020; 272: 241-247.

Authors: Watson DI, Thompson SK, Devitt PG, Aly A, Irvine T, Woods SD et al.

Scientific Surgery

Prevention of fascial dehiscence with onlay prophylactic mesh in emergency laparotomy: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 230: 76-87.

Authors: Lima HVG, Rassian R, Novo FCF, Bernini CO, Montero EFS, Utiyama EM et al.

Scientific Surgery

Primary fascial closure during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair improves patient quality of life. A multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2020; 271: 434-439

Authors: Bernardi K, Olavarria OA, Holihan JL, Kao LS, Ko TC, Roth JS et al.

Scientific Surgery

Prophylactic biological mesh Reinforcement versus Standard Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS): a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 395: 417-426

Authors: Reinforcement of Stoma Closure Site (ROCSS) Collaborative , West Midlands Research Collaborative

Scientific Surgery

Prophylactic intraperitoneal onlay mesh following midline laparotomy—long-term results of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2019; 43: 1669-1675.

Authors: Glauser PM, Brosi P, Speich B, Kaser SA, Heigl A, Rosenberg R et al.

Scientific Surgery

Effectiveness of prophylactic intraperitoneal mesh implantation for prevention of incisional hernia in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2019; 154: 109-115.

Authors: Kohler A, Lavanchy JL, Lenoir U, Kurmann A, Candinas D, Beldi G et al.